Stewardship

Bay Nature Publisher David Loeb: Yes on Measure AA

May 10, 2016

It appears that, once again, by the time the California primary rolls around, both the Republicans and Democrats will already have their “presumptive nominees” for president. So is there any reason to go to the polls on Tuesday, June 7? ABSOLUTELY!!

In case you haven’t heard, that’s the day we in the Bay Area get to deliver the message that we want a Clean and Healthy Bay and that we’re willing to pay $1 a month (if we’re property owners) to make sure we get it.

When it comes to San Francisco Bay, we’re at a tipping point. On the one hand, we’ve stopped the destructive filling of the Bay and now have some two and a half decades experience under our belt restoring a small but significant portion of the 200,000 acres of Bay wetlands lost to agricultural and infrastructural development. On the other hand, we’ve got sea level rise coming on strong, threatening much of that infrastructure as well as many of those restored sites.

Fortunately, we are learning—rather quickly—how to adapt our shorelines to be resilient to the rising tides without having to resort to expensive walls and levees to keep them out. And we’ve come to realize that this kind of “soft” and “natural” infrastructure along the shoreline buys us not only resilience to climate change and protection from flooding, but also great wildlife habitat and increased recreational access to the gem of a waterway at the heart of our region.

The problem is, restoring wetlands isn’t cheap. And that’s where the San Francisco Bay Restoration Authority comes in. It was created by the state legislature back in 2008 to oversee and coordinate funding for Bay-focused restoration activites. But there’s another problem: This authority doesn’t have any money. That’s where you and Measure AA come in.

Under Measure AA, your dollar per month—along with that of all property owners thoughout the nine county Bay Area—will be transformed into at least $500,000,000 for Bay restoration projects over the next 20 years. Moreover, that funding will leverage additional state and federal monies for flood control, endangered species protection, and the like.

So…what’s the downside? I give up; I don’t see one. Except that Measure AA needs a two-thirds majority to pass, and that’s a big lift. And an even bigger one if you don’t vote! So I’m hoping that we’ll all get to the polls to take advantage of this once-in-a-generation opportunity to ensure the future health and survival of San Francisco Bay and of the human and wildlife communities that depend on it.

To find out more, go to yesonaaforthebay.com.

About the Author

David Loeb was the co-founder and Executive Director of the Bay Nature Institute and the publisher of Bay Nature magazine. Now retired, he continues to roam the trails and waterways of the Bay Area and points beyond and contributes occasional articles to baynature.org.